Canada’s doomed, eh?

Oh noes, global warming hates Canada:

Backyard hockey rinks may become extinct in Canada if climate change goes unchecked, a renowned McGill University scientist says. “In the next 50 years, the skating season could disappear in most of the regions across Canada,” Lawrence Mysak told CTV Montreal.

If only there were indoor rinks that made it possible to skate in any weather, or even for hockey to be played in places like Miami, Tampa and Phoenix. Oh, wait.

But wait, there’s more. Simon Fraser University says no matter how much carbon Canada saves, or how many hippies wander the BC interior, we’re toast:

“Let’s be honest, it’s totally unrealistic to believe that we can stop all emissions now,” says Zickfeld, an assistant professor of geography at SFU. “Even with aggressive greenhouse gas mitigation, it will be a challenge to keep the projected global rise in temperature under 2 degrees Celsius,” emphasizes Zickfeld.

The geographer wrote the paper with Damon Matthews, a University of Concordia associate professor at the Department of Geography, Planning and Environment.

The duo used an earth system climate model developed by the University of Victoria to study the impact of greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions on the world’s climate. The study was based on emission levels that are consistent with data from the 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

They used a computer model and data from the IPCC. What could possibly go wrong?

Before you panic and run for the indoor skating rinks to escape slightly milder weather, here’s the Motley CRU’s own Phil Jones on the all-important 2 degree Celsius limit:

The 2 deg C limit is talked about by a lot within Europe. It is never defined though what it means. Is it 2 deg C for the globe or for Europe? Also when is/was the base against which the 2 deg C is calculated from? I know you don’t know the answer, but I don’t either! I think it is plucked out of thin air. I think it is too high as well. If it is 2 deg C globally, this could be more in Europe – especially the northern part. A better limit might be maintaining some summer Arctic sea ice!

Climate scientists making stuff up? Say it ain’t so.

Round-Up tomorrow, unless you behave.

8 thoughts on “Canada’s doomed, eh?”

  1. Is there such a thing as an un-renowned research promoting alarmist in the climate?
    Looks to me like they’re a couple of geographers which means they can draw you maps to where the indoor rinks are.
    The coverage in the Guardian was hilarious – we poor Canucks – losing our ability to play our outdoor street hockey on ponds…
    Has anyone seen a kid play street hockey on a pond lately?

  2. Is there such a thing as an un-renowned research promoting alarmist in the climate?
    Looks to me like they’re a couple of geographers which means they can draw you maps to where the indoor rinks are.
    The coverage in the Guardian was hilarious – we poor Canucks – losing our ability to play our outdoor street hockey on ponds…
    Has anyone seen a kid play street hockey on a pond lately?

  3. wow,
    THE WINTER TEMERATURE COULD RISE FROM – 40 TO -38 IN PLACES AND ALL THE ICE WOULD MELT, I CAN SEE THAT WOULD BE A REAL PROBLEM.

  4. wow,
    THE WINTER TEMERATURE COULD RISE FROM – 40 TO -38 IN PLACES AND ALL THE ICE WOULD MELT, I CAN SEE THAT WOULD BE A REAL PROBLEM.

  5. Stupid me! Here I thought all along that the rinks would be inundated by seawater. Do any of the AGW people have ANY scientific integrity? AGW is right up there with those great scientific movements of phlogiston and phrenology. Correction with “science like this going on at taxpayer expense they are right we really are F#@ked!

  6. Stupid me! Here I thought all along that the rinks would be inundated by seawater. Do any of the AGW people have ANY scientific integrity? AGW is right up there with those great scientific movements of phlogiston and phrenology. Correction with “science like this going on at taxpayer expense they are right we really are F#@ked!

Comments are closed.